On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 12:50:03AM +0000, Arun Saravanan wrote: > Didn’t realize that Maciek Machnikowski’s proposal for PTP Time of Day > proposal is still pending. I have attached here for reference.
Ok, that explains what it's supposed to do. Thanks. Should another process be steering the clock when ptp4l assumes it's running free? The rate calculations will be wrong and other things could potentially break if ptp4l more relied on it, right? Maybe I'm missing an important detail here, but to me I think it would make more sense to use the refclock_sock or ntpshm servo to feed ts2phc instead of the slave event monitor. -- Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
