Thanks for your time. What do you mean with "PUSH" message?
I agree with you in order to keep it simple. ciao luigi Il giorno ven 10 nov 2023 alle ore 17:58 Richard Cochran < richardcoch...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 07:58:14AM +0100, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: > > > Using just polling on UDS is a bad idea IMHO because you need to capture > at > > the exact same time point all counters of all ports spending a lot of > > effort and cpu. > > So make it into a PUSH message. > > > It's better to have the gathering > > under the hood and a way to inquiry the system. > > No, I disagree. It should be done externally, because most people > don't want or need this. These statistics are a waste of time, and I > won't make the program more complex just to support silly stuff. > > Thanks, > Richard > -- *Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini* My Professional Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/comio> *"UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." [cit.]*
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
