Ah. I was about to forward you to Yanir when I saw this email. I believe the e1000e team is currently working on validating a release that can be put on sourceforge which will include this fix.
Regards, Jake On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 10:42 -0500, Robb wrote: > Yanir at: > https://sourceforge.net/p/e1000/mailman/message/34158396/ > was able to help me with this problem. > > He provided me with a patch to get this working. > I have tested it and it has been working for > hour with > no errors! > > Here is a the patch + what I did in case it helps anyone else. > > wget -O e1000e-3.1.0.2.tar.gz > "http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/e1000e%20stable/3.1.0.2/e1000e-3.1.0.2.tar.gz/download"; > tar xvf e1000e-3.1.0.2.tar.gz > cd e1000e-3.1.0.2/src; patch < ../../fix_systim_issues-3.1.0.2.patch > sudo make install > > $ cat fix_systim_issues-3.1.0.2.patch > --- netdev.c.orig 2015-06-01 16:49:37.802312304 +0300 > +++ netdev.c 2015-06-01 16:51:19.468306452 +0300 > @@ -4614,7 +4614,10 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read( > cycle_t systim, systim_next; > > /* latch SYSTIMH on read of SYSTIML */ > - systim = (cycle_t)er32(SYSTIML); > + u32 systim_overflow_latch_fix = 0x3FFFFFFF; > + do { > + systim = (cycle_t)er32(SYSTIML); > + } while (systim > systim_overflow_latch_fix); > systim |= (cycle_t)er32(SYSTIMH) << 32; > > if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) { > > > > I apologize, my email composer (gmail) seems to delete the tabs in the patch. > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Richard Cochran > <richardcoch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:59:29PM -0500, Robb wrote: > >> For whatever reason phc2sys seems to be blowing up the offsets. > >> > >> My set up is as follows: > >> > >> Two CentOS 6.5 machines > >> 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64 > >> linuxptp-1.3-1.el6.x86_64 > >> > >> Machine1 eth1 [igb 5.0.5-k] Intel I210 (rev 03) > >> Machine2 eth0 [e1000e 2.3.2-k] Intel I217-LM (rev 05) > > > > The I217-LM has a known HW bug. > > > >> I have read that there was some problems with the e1000e driver so I tried > >> with > >> the 3.1.0.2-NAPI version, but still have the same problem as above. > >> > >> Does anyone have any ideas what could be the problem here? > > > > This isn't a driver problem but rather a HW bug. I don't have that HW, > > and I have not yet heard of any SW (driver) work arounds. You might > > ask on the e1000e list if Intel has a solution to this problem. > > > > Thanks, > > Richard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Linuxptp-users mailing list > Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
