Good,

any estimate when this ends up in Linux 4.9?

Also, is the other issue [1] looked at?
Just want to know if I need to poke somewhere / someone, the mailing
list seems to more of a patch tracker.

Kind Regards,
Norbert Lange

[1] - 
http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/Week-of-Mon-20170220/008171.html

2017-02-28 22:07 GMT+01:00 Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 2:53 AM
>> To: Norbert Lange <nolang...@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>; linuxptp-
>> us...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] PTP Clock completely wrong on an Intel 82579L
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:20:26AM +0100, Norbert Lange wrote:
>> > Yeah, I seen that matrix, and both NICs are on that list. Still have
>> > some rather serious issues, one is completely useless (82579LM, e1000e
>> > driver) and the other (i354, igb driver) apparently wraps the timer
>> > very 18 minutes, losing their master role.
>>
>> Looks like you aren't the only one with this issue:
>>
>>   https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2446767.html
>>
>> So it does look like a bug where driver the driver selects the wrong
>> clock values.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Richard
>
> Yep that's what it sounded like. Glad that appears resolved now.
>
> Regards,
> Jake

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

Reply via email to