On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 01:25:27PM -0700, Gary E. Miller wrote: > Yo All! > > Small bug in ntpshm.c: > > int clockTimeStampNSec; > int receiveTimeStampNSec; > > Both NTP Classic, and NTPsec have changed that the int to unsigned to > avoid an upcoming rollover issue.
Hm, which rollover issue? The fields are not supposed to have values outside interval [0, 999999999]. ptp4l and phc2sys follow that, so it does not matter if the fields are declared as signed or unsigned. -- Miroslav Lichvar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
