Thanks for the answer.

No, i really did mean nics. I have a data acquisition pc with 6 ethernet
interfaces. I'm looking for a software solution.

Le jeu. 27 sept. 2018 2:59 PM, shouldbe q931 <shouldbeq...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:57 PM Maxime Lemonnier
> <maxime.lemonn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to do something similar but slightly different than Vadim on
> this thread https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/message/35980617/
> >
> > I too have PTP ethernet cameras that need the full bandwidth of the nic.
> The difference is that I also have a PTP timeserver (timemachine's
> TM2000A). The host PC uses linuxptp with hardware timestamping.
> >
> > When I put the cameras on the same gig-e switch, it all plays nice and I
> get satisfying offsets (sub us).
> >
> > To put the cameras on their own nic, I must also put them on their own
> subnets, so I would need to route ptp traffic back'n'forth. Is that
> possible?
> >
> > Should I rather synch the cameras with my (synched) PC clock with, e.g.
> > ptp4l -i if_cam0 -i if_cam1 -m -S
> >
> > (I noticed you can't use hardware timestamping with multiple interface
> for reasons that are probably obvious to you guys)
> >
> > If so, I may have not tried hard enough, but I could not get satisfying
> results with that methods (I have a litle setup that trigs cameras, and the
> returned timestamps were 10-100 ms appart)
> >
>
> I presume when you say "cameras on their own nic" I presume you mean
> "cameras on their own switch" ?
>
> To go between subnet, there are two options, routing, or a boundary
> clock. Determining which is most appropriate depends on the budget and
> level of synchronisation required
>
> Unless you have a different requirement to have the cameras on a
> different subnet to your grandmaster, why not simply link the switches
> at L2 ?
>
> Cheers
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

Reply via email to