On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 01:59:24PM +0000, Luke Bigum wrote: > Regarding ptp4l only writing PTP timescale to PHCs... Imagine I > wanted to packet capture with Hardware Timestamps on the same > interface where ptp4l is receiving PTP messages. If the GM is > sending TAI+offset, ptp4l is writing TAI time to that PHC, and my > PCAPs would be stamped with a less user-friendly time.
You probably already know this, but in general there is no guarantee that the libpcap hw time stamps are synchronized to anything at all. > This would probably break all it's boundary clock behaviour, so I'd > imagine it only ever used with slaveOnly=1. Is that a reasonable > feature request? It opens up a can of worms... think leap second handling! I don't want to go there. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
