Thank you Richard for your response. I am using -S option cause I want a Software time stamping - I am working on the VM. In the link I put in my first post, it is said that "The master/slave port roles will be selected automatically using the protocol". So I assume that the configuration went properly. The thing I don't understand is that why "assuming the grand master role" is it printed more that once? Is it because both interfaces have chosen the same master clock (fa163e.fffe.fdf714) and they are both synchronized to it?
Thanks, Tom czw., 18 lip 2019 o 19:31 Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:29:19AM +0200, Tomek Koziak wrote: > > Thank you Richard for your response. > > I am using -S option cause I want a Software time stamping - I am working > > on the VM. > > In the link I put in my first post, it is said that "The master/slave > port > > roles will be selected automatically using the protocol". So I assume > that > > the configuration went properly. The thing I don't understand is that > > why "assuming > > the grand master role" is it printed more that once? Is it because both > > interfaces have chosen the same master clock (fa163e.fffe.fdf714) and > they > > are both synchronized to it? > > Please keep the mailing list on CC. > > Thanks, > Richard >
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
