Issue is resolved when nic firmware is upgraded to 8.30 version. - Karthick
> On Jun 14, 2021, at 10:47 PM, Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com >> <mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com>> >> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2021 11:39 PM >> To: Karthick Gunasekaran <karth...@pluribusnetworks.com >> <mailto:karth...@pluribusnetworks.com>> >> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net> >> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] [LinuxPTP] Seeing SYNC without timestamp, >> DELAY_REQ without timestamp >> >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:17:18AM +0530, Karthick Gunasekaran via Linuxptp- >> users wrote: >>> When trying ptp4l with hardware timestamp on a hw timestamp supported >> interface, the sync and delay request packets are being received without >> timestamp. >>> >>> Linux version : 4.4.0-87-generic >> >> That must be a distro kernel -- which distro? >> >>> root@ptp-slave:~# ethtool -i enp1s0f0 >>> driver: i40e >>> version: 2.15.9 >> >> Hm, did kernel 4.4 already have PTP support in the i40e? >> >> Maybe this is a buggy back port? >> > > The first initial release of the kernel that hat i40e PTP support is v3.14, > however... there are a lot of fixes, many of which are significantly newer > than 4.4 > >> Thanks, >> Richard >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linuxptp-users mailing list >> Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users >> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users>
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
