Greetings, While testing devices with gPTP we encountered, in our opinion, quite inconsequential behavior. Using different setups, we set following flags and had following outcome:
gmCapable = 0 , slaveOnly = 0 -> OK gmCapable = 1 , slaveOnly = 0 -> OK gmCapable = 0 , slaveOnly = 1 -> Cannot mix 1588 slaveOnly with 802.1AS !gmCapable gmCapable = 1 , slaveOnly = 1 -> OK Frankly, I would expect combination of "gmCapable = 1 , slaveOnly = 1" to fail rather than "gmCapable = 0 , slaveOnly = 1". masterOnly flags are working properly. For some devices we really want to keep slaveOnly devices, even with gPTP, but we were surprised that these options are mutually exclusive. Is there a particular reason only one of these cases fails to start? Best regards Jakub Raczynski
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
