On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:59:02AM +0800, 这个🍊 不太冷 wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply.
> Q1.I have known the monitor socket should be created by the mointor, like PMC.
>
>
> ptp4l --slave_event_monitor=/tmp/foo
> pmc -u -i /tmp/foo
When I run those ^^^ commands, I see:
0019b8.fffe.09896d-0 seq 129 SIGNALING SLAVE_RX_SYNC_TIMING_DATA N 1
sourcePortIdentity a0369f.fffe.10cfaf-1
sequenceId 44565
syncOriginTimestamp 1655732998.612437157
totalCorrectionField 0
scaledCumulativeRateOffset 0
syncEventIngressTimestamp 1655732998.612437752
0019b8.fffe.09896d-0 seq 138 SIGNALING SLAVE_DELAY_TIMING_DATA_NP N 1
sourcePortIdentity a0369f.fffe.10cfaf-1
sequenceId 138
delayOriginTimestamp 1655732998.628124923
totalCorrectionField 0
delayResponseTimestamp 1655732998.628125507
0019b8.fffe.09896d-0 seq 130 SIGNALING SLAVE_RX_SYNC_TIMING_DATA N 1
sourcePortIdentity a0369f.fffe.10cfaf-1
sequenceId 44566
syncOriginTimestamp 1655732999.612473029
totalCorrectionField 0
scaledCumulativeRateOffset 0
syncEventIngressTimestamp 1655732999.612473630
So it works!
Don't you see it working?
> The ptp4l don't need to create a socket fd bind the
> slave_event_monitor address, so how it send message to the local
> address? It use the API raw_send() to achieve send the message to
> the fd to PMC client? Socket created only in PMC, is it?
Read the code to find out how it works.
> I'm now using v3.1, port.c line 1298 is not the implementation
> code. Which version should I see.
Version v3.1
~~~~~~~~~~~~
1176 switch (p->state) {
1177 case PS_UNCALIBRATED:
1178 case PS_SLAVE:
1179 monitor_sync(p->slave_event_monitor,
1180 clock_parent_identity(p->clock), seqid,
1181 t1, tmv_add(c1, c2), t2);
1182 break;
1183 default:
1184 break;
1185 }
HTH,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
