So Xilinx had me update the build environment because of an unrelated issue, with the added benefit that now things appear completely broken:
Nov 19 09:26:20 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [421.049] port 1: FAULTY to LISTENING on INIT_COMPLETE Nov 19 09:26:21 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [422.000] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Nov 19 09:26:22 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [422.999] port 1: new foreign master 489ebd.fffe.9f7c1b-1 Nov 19 09:26:22 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [422.999] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Nov 19 09:26:23 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [424.000] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Nov 19 09:26:24 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [425.000] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Nov 19 09:26:25 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [426.000] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Nov 19 09:26:26 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [427.000] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Nov 19 09:26:26 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [427.000] selected best master clock 489ebd.fffe.9f7c1b Nov 19 09:26:26 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [427.000] running in a temporal vortex Nov 19 09:26:26 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [427.000] port 1: LISTENING to UNCALIBRATED on RS_SLAVE Nov 19 09:26:27 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [428.000] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Nov 19 09:26:28 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [428.762] missing timestamp on transmitted delay request Nov 19 09:26:28 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 ptp4l: [428.762] port 1: UNCALIBRATED to FAULTY on FAULT_DETECTED (FT_UNSPECIFIED) Nov 19 09:26:28 xilinx-kv260-starterkit-20221 phc2sys: [429.215] Waiting for ptp4l... Phc2sys Waiting for ptp4l messages omitted save for the last one shown. Thoughts? Brian Lilly / Senior Firmware Engineer Email: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Richard Cochran <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 3:31 PM To: Brian Lilly <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Help with what is undoubtedly a problem with my configuration On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:21:09PM +0000, Brian Lilly wrote: > This is on a Kria K26 SOM, though granted, it's the development board KV260 > version and not the production SOM. I can test on a production SOM if that's > an issue. I would ask the vendor if/how they tested and validated the PTP feature. Good luck, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
