Got it. Thanks. On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:39 PM Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:33:31PM +0530, Aditya Venu via Linuxptp-users > wrote: > > I'm doing a two step time stamping and acting as a master. My doubt is: > > Should the sequence ID for sync, followup, announce, delay req and delay > > resp as shown in the screenshot be the same for one iteration? > > Only messages that are responses to other message are expected to have > the same sequence ID. That is sync and follow_up, delay_req and > delay_resp, and pdelay_req and pdelay_resp/pdelay_resp_follow_up. > > > > > After the follow_up is received by the slave, will the immediate next > > message from the slave be delay_request? > > No, delay requests are independent from sync/followup messages. There > can be zero, one, or multiple delay requests between two sync > messages. > > -- > Miroslav Lichvar > > -- Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by one of the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
