> The option works for me.
@Miroslav Lichvar, Could you elaborate how you test this to confirm the
behavior? I'll try the same too.



On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 17:38, Gururaj Badiger <gururaj.badi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> That was a typo. I set it to 20 nanoseconds.
> Monitor comparing the reference timing of Dev2 with Delay introduced
> Timing of Dev1 (i.e., Dev1 has Delay Asymmetry set to 20ns).
> .
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 17:22, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:21:11PM +0530, Gururaj Badiger wrote:
>> > Waveform Monitor takes Black inputs generated by Dev1 and Dev2 devices.
>> >
>> > In this setup, Dev2 is locked to Dev1 PTP Leader. Now, when I change the
>> > "delayAsymmetry '' value of Dev2, from 0 to 20us, we are expecting a
>> timing
>> > shift in Waveform Monitor. However, we dont see any change.
>> > This seems to indicate the value set to parameter delayAsymmetry doesn't
>> > have any effect.
>>
>> The option works for me. Did you set it to 20000 (nanoseconds)?
>> What exactly is the monitor comparing, two PPS signals from PHC on the
>> server and client?
>>
>> --
>> Miroslav Lichvar
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

Reply via email to