On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 12:17 +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 January 2012 02:59:44 David Robillard wrote:
> > <lv2.h> is the old-style include.  It is still installed there, but
> > things are migrating to the new-style URI-like includes.  There's
> > nothing really wrong with using <lv2.h> for now (for extensions, though,
> > the *only* system include is the URI-style one).
> > 
> > Bundling headers in your source is fine, and how most things have been
> > done in the past, but I am trying to encourage a migration to sane
> > packaging and system-installed extension headers because the duplication
> > is pretty crazy.  That said, for the time being, including them is still
> > probably the pragmatic thing to do until packagers catch up.
> > 
> > lv2.h is probably an exception since it is always present if lv2core is
> > installed.  Everyone I know of depends on lv2core via pkg-config and
> > includes the system lv2.h in the usual way (as if it were a library).
> 
> Yes, lv2core is available in most distributions. However e.g. on Debian 
> "Squeeze", it is fairly old (v3.0, may 2009). So the question is just whether 
> the LV2 support along with the extensions will work completely as expected 
> with such an old lv2core. If yes, we leave it as it is right now.
> 
> Since you are actively working on the extensions, I must leave it to you to 
> decide whether to include lv2core with the sampler sources.

The API in the header has never changed, it should be fine.

-dr



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel

Reply via email to