On 04/11/2012 12:06 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote: > On 04/11/2012 12:37 AM, Luis Garrido wrote: >> On 04/11/2012 12:25 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote: >> >>> Did you also build the nsm-proxy (branch) and added the script via >>> client nsm-proxy? >> >> Nope, just fired up nsmd and non-session-manager, created a session, >> added the script via the GUI and started and closed the session several >> times to check it worked. >> >> Luis > > Maybe you could try to build the nsm-proxy, and add it as client. Use > this script as binary and add an lscp file to the arguments of the > nsm-proxy. This script *should* work, but here it doesn't. Maybe I miss > something. Would be nice if you could give it a shot. > > #!/bin/bash > > linuxsampler & > > LSPID=$! > > # wait for LS to init > sleep 4; > > # tell it what file to load > cat "$1" | nc localhost 8888 > > #handle SIGTERM from NSM by killing LS. > trap `kill -KILL $LSPID` SIGTERM
or trap `kill -TERM $LSPID` SIGTERM > > #wait for LS to die naturally > wait $LSPID > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to >> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second >> resolution app monitoring today. Free. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Linuxsampler-devel mailing list >> Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
