On Friday 28 February 2014 13:09:39 Sergey wrote: > I've searched available SFZ specs and there is no official include > operator. So yes, it is my suggestion.
In general I think that extension makes sense, so I am not opposed to apply it to the sampler. I just wonder whether a special prefix shall be used, indicating a custom extension, to avoid a potential clash with an "official" SFZ include statement that might be introduced in future. What do our SFZ experts say? Andreas? Anders? Grigor? CU Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
