On Freitag, 3. November 2017 13:34:34 CET Jaime T wrote:
> Damaged Sample 201) "058v3ub" expectedCRC=ffffffff calculatedCRC=8ce5c64c
> Damaged Sample 202) "058v3db" expectedCRC=ffffffff calculatedCRC=2c60b335
> Damaged Sample 203) "058" expectedCRC=ffffffff calculatedCRC=86cd6610
> Damaged Sample 204) "058" expectedCRC=ffffffff calculatedCRC=f1ab313c
>
> I'll be the first to admit that I don't fully understand what is going
> on here, but I have a funny feeling that something isn't quite as it
> should be.
Looks strange to me. First of all, check if you are really running gigdump
with the latest version of lilbgig:
gigdump -v
which should look like this:
gigdump revision 3330
using libgig 4.0.0.svn33
Because sometimes people still have an old version of libgig under i.e.
/usr/local which might conflict with another installation directory.
Then try to rebuild the checksum table a 2nd time. Because your output said
that it needed to rebuild the file structure, which is not very common. So
maybe after rebuilding the checksum the 2nd time it might work in your case.
If not, then you might also try to open the file with gigedit and then use
"Save as ..." and save it under a new file name. Make sure you are using the
latest version of gigedit and libgig there as well (shown in gigedit's About
box).
> Would there be any value in me trying the same operations with the
> Artvista Malmsjo Acoustic Grand and the Tascam BG
> (Biggagigga/Purgatory Creek) Rhodes gigs, or should I just log a bug?
Uhm, I think it would require you like 5 seconds to find that out. ;-)
CU
Christian
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
