On Freitag, 25. Mai 2018 16:53:42 CEST Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 05/25/18 15:53, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > so you came up with this idea, correct? > > Yes, for my experiments and projects sake. > > I'll see if I can use some of the described methods instead. Using up > all the MIDI channels was just a last resort, also latency wise.
Ok, I see. I first thought you are referring to this solution since there might be some kind of exotic hardware organ or something that sends these messages already. Well under that circumstance I would definitely not use the MIDI channel bits for that. In the end, you can also invent a new MIDI message like "fine tune only the next note on this part" (i.e. by picking an arbitrary NRPN or a short SysEx). Latency was an issue with the old classic DIN MIDI jacks, but it is definitely not with todays USB and Bluetooth LE based MIDI connections anymore. Existing controllers like the previously mentioned "Seaboard" use the described method of using pitchbend and MIDI channel distribution simply because it would work with most sound expanders and plugins out of the box. CU Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
