On Donnerstag, 13. Mai 2021 22:20:26 CEST Barry Jackson wrote: > On 13/05/2021 18:23, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > Already filed: > > https://bugs.linuxsampler.org/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=193 > > > > I think some people are using a std lib call to generate a time stamp > > instead, which is not real-time safe though. A CPU/asm solution for > > generating the time stamp would be better. > > That bug is over 6 years old! > > So for now we just drop gig/linuxsampler/gigedit from all arm builds I > guess.
Makes sense. > Is a solution being worked on? Not that I know of. The way to go is to read out the cpu cycle register, which is the fastest solution and real-time safe. The other asm code mentioned should already been taken care of. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck _______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
