> Which makes me wonder why I don't get these GTK compiler errors with the same > gtk(mm) 3.24.5 version. Are you sure you are compiling against the header > files of exactly *that* gtk version and not probably against header files of > gtk(mm) 4.x? Because gtk4 is not supported, gtk2 and gtk3 are though. Looks like gtkmm-3.0 to me:
configure:20453: g++ -std=gnu++11 -c -g -O2 -I/usr/include/gtkmm-3.0 -I/usr/lib/gtkmm-3.0/include -I/usr/include/giomm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/giomm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/fribidi -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/lzo -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0 -I/usr/include/cloudproviders -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/at-spi2-atk/2.0 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/at-spi-2.0 -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/lib/cairomm-1.0/include -I/usr/include/pangomm-1.4 -I/usr/lib/pangomm-1.4/include -I/usr/include/atkmm-1.6 -I/usr/lib/atkmm-1.6/include -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0/unix-print -I/usr/include/gdkmm-3.0 -I/usr/lib/gdkmm-3.0/include -pthread conftest.cpp >&5 GTKMM_LIBS='-lgtkmm-3.0 -latkmm-1.6 -lgdkmm-3.0 -lgiomm-2.4 -lgtk-3 -lgdk-3 -lz -latk-1.0 -lcairo-gobject -lgio-2.0 -lpangomm-1.4 -lglibmm-2.4 -lcairomm-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lharfbuzz -lcairo -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 ' GTK_CFLAGS='-I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/fribidi -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/lzo -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0 -I/usr/include/cloudproviders -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/at-spi2-atk/2.0 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/at-spi-2.0 -pthread ' Or am I missing something? I'm a little bit confused that it states gtkmm-3.0, although my package-management states gtkmm3 version 3.24.5-2 > What compiler and compiler version (see config.log file)? g++ (GCC) 11.1.0 > > I managed to install gigedit by applying two patches: > > > > gigedit-1.2.0-libdir.patch > > gigedit-1.2.0-redeclare.patch > > > > but have no clue, what exactly it is they're doing.... > > Me neither. You are only posting patch names, but not the URL where you got > them from. Since installing gigedit-svn from archlinux' AUR didn't work, I looked into the PKGBUILD of the 'official' package https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/gigedit/ Here's the link to the corresponding github-directory including the patches: https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/tree/packages/gigedit/trunk The PKGBUILD states: # install shared object to global namespace, so no ld.so.conf is required patch -Np1 -i ../"${pkgname}-1.2.0-libdir.patch" # do not extend the pango namespace (breaks the build) patch -Np1 -i ../"${pkgname}-1.2.0-redeclare.patch" > The CRC-32 checksum of each sample in a .gig file are generated/updated only > at the end of the .gig file saving process. So it is normal that new samples > first have a CRC initialized with ffffffff at first. Ah, ok! > > Are those issues related to each other? > > - My guess is no. > > Does anybody has an idea, what the root-cause might be? > > As my telepathic abilities are just sub average, and my valueable crystal > ball > has never been handed back to me, I fear you would need to provide more info > that a mortal person would be able to decode. That's a shame! Maybe, you should have asked the crystal ball, before giving it away, if you will ever get it back? ;) > You could start by providing the questioned info, plus a backtrace of the > crash. I will try to gather some more information next week and follow up on this. Thanks and have a nice weekend! Cheers, Kolja
_______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
