Hi,
I was able to build linuxsampler on loongarch64 with some minor tweaks and would
like to share them and possibly merge into linuxsampler.
I also successfully ran `make check` with those changes.
All patches applied against 2.4.0
1. Add CreateTimeStamp() implementation for loongarch64
--- a/src/common/RTMath.cpp
+++ b/src/common/RTMath.cpp
@@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ RTMathBase::time_stamp_t RTMathBase::CreateTimeStamp() {
uint32_t t;
asm volatile ("mrc p15, 0, %0, c15, c12, 1" : "=r" (t));
return t;
+ #elif defined(__loongarch__) && __loongarch_grlen == 64
+ uint64_t t;
+ asm volatile ("rdtime.d %0, $zero" : "=r" (t));
+ return t;
#else // we don't want to use a slow generic solution
# error "Sorry, LinuxSampler lacks time stamp code for your system."
# error "Please report this error and the CPU you are using to the
LinuxSampler developers mailing list!"
2. Add generic atomic_sub implementation
--- a/src/common/atomic.h
+++ b/src/common/atomic.h
@@ -1473,6 +1473,11 @@ static __inline__ void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
v->counter--;
}
+static __inline__ void atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
+{
+ v->counter -= i;
+}
+
static __inline__ int atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v)
{
int res;
For the second patch I don't know if generic implementation should have
atomic_sub but it does not compile without it. Also I guess that it is better to
have loongarch64 specific atomic but I'm not sure if I'll be able to work it out
on my own.
Waiting for feedback!
--
Ilya Sorochan
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
