Andrew, Thanks for the reply :)
I'll probably start a thread at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.discuss just to clarify the description as well as the specific mailing list which is represented, and to perhaps change the hierarchy to something more accurate. Personally, I'm just lurking for the time period, for what it's worth. -Thufir On 1/4/10, Andrew Overholt <overh...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > * Thufir <hawat.thu...@gmail.com> [2009-12-24 07:19]: >> >> It looks like the old gmane group is inactive(?): >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ide.eclipse.packaging.linux/186 >> >> Is there a new gmane group, or does it need to be resubscribed to gmane? > > I recently got an email about a gmane group for this mailing list. It > was incorrectly named/described IMO but the person I spoke with at gmane > said it couldn't be changed. > > I don't personally use gmane but welcome the addition of our mailing > list. Please don't include "packaging" in the group name, either, since > that's far from everything this project is about. > > Thanks, > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
