-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-08-10 03:19, Matt Whitlock wrote: > After bringing all the dependencies up to date and jumping through the usual > hoops, I get hit with this: > > [...] > > Unless NO_ELEMENT is null (which it isn't), that code cannot possibly be > correct. The compiler is right to complain about it. Please see the > attached patch for a correct implementation that compiles cleanly. > > After applying the attached patch, Eclipse 3.6 builds successfully on Gentoo. > :-) > > > On Monday, 9 August 2010, at 4:43 pm, Andrew Overholt wrote: >> * Matt Whitlock <m...@whitlock.name> [2010-08-09 16:39]: >>> Linux Tools 0.6.0 has been out for a while, but there is still no Eclipse >>> Build 0.6.0? >> >> I'm going to tag it tomorrow :) In the meantime, can you build from SVN >> trunk with this tarball and see if it all works on Gentoo? >> >> >> http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/linuxtools/eclipse-build/e36-branch/eclipse-3.6.0-src-noxpt.tar.bz2 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linuxtools-dev mailing list >> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Hi Maybe we should also consider backporting the patch for 321926[1] (assuming e-b has not been tagged already). NB: The patch has not been reviewed yet, but it hopefully fixes a compiler optimization that causes invalid byte code. ~Niels [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=321926 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=176134 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkxhCNUACgkQVCqoiq1YlqxbjACgpltMJRkg9UsiFpLxa6lBc5RN NvYAnA1nn5Eo7yRYsJ5XEc05UTz0EEzK =G9DV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
