+1 Git works well for the Linux Kernel development, so it will be good for us, too.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/12/2011 09:14 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Happy new year, everyone. If you recently had some holidays, I hope >> they were nice. >> >> I know we discussed this before but I'd like to once again bring up the >> topic of moving to git. I've been using git on the command line myself >> and really liking it. I was speaking with Severin the other day and he >> said that he thinks EGit is ready for everyday use, especially for those >> that are used to centralized version control systems like SVN. If we >> move to git we can also get the benefits of Gerrit code review [1] but >> we can discuss that separately. For now let's just decide on SVN->git. >> >> Let's discuss it here and vote with a simple +1, 0, or -1. The voting >> should be done on the proposition: >> >> "the Linux Tools project move from SVN to Git as soon as possible" >> >> I'll tally up the votes at 22:00 UTC on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 (5 >> PM North America Eastern). I guess my vote should be registered as +1. >> >> Thanks and looking forward to a fun and productive 2011 for the Linux >> Tools project, >> >> Andrew >> > > If Severin thinks EGit is good enough to replace SVN, I have no problems. > +1 > > -- Jeff J. > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >
_______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev