Ah, thanks Patrick! I had that code snippet commented out with a FIXME comment on it as it seemed to change from the version that I started with to the current version and I had not yet figured out what the correct syntax was. I will give that a go.
Sensible time stamp formatting is another thing I am going to have to figure out. If the state viewer really does end up being trace agnostic like I am aiming for, then how the timestamps are formatted probably also should be data driven. You are of course correct that the timestamps I am using right now are all epoch based. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Aaron, > Nice work! > You might want to try this on your time graph combo since your time stamps > seem to be epoch-based: > timeGraphCombo.getTimeGraphViewer().setTimeFormat(TimeFormat.CALENDAR); > Patrick > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Aaron Spear < asp...@vmware.com > wrote: > > > I think that I can see your point though, it would perhaps be useful to > > > see > > > > explicitly which methods are upstack at a given moment. Next week I will > > > try > > > > to create a different state/color for a function being "up stack" and see > > > > how that looks. > > > Michel, > > > FYI here is another screenshot showing the java tracer changed a bit so > > that > > when a context is up stack it has a different state. > > > Aaron > > > _______________________________________________ > > > linuxtools-dev mailing list > > > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
