Also, I don't think that preferences should be labeled by project name. Users should not need to know that some preferences are from the Linux Tools project or from the CDT project.
Therefore I think things like Gcov, and other C/C++ preferences provided by Linux Tools should go under C/C++, but not using a "Linux Tools" category. The goal in the end is to provide a united solution for C/C++ users. Thanks Marc ________________________________ From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Overholt Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:14 AM To: Linux Tools developer discussions Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] preference pages The problem is that some of these aren't C/C++ and not all of them are Linux-focused :) On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Xavier Raynaud <xavier.rayn...@kalray.eu<mailto:xavier.rayn...@kalray.eu>> wrote: Hi, I'm currently working on some preference pages for gcov and gprof, and I discovered that there is no root categrory for linuxtools preference pages. Changelog, Gcov, Library Hover, Man pages, SystemTap, Tracing preferences are all at root level of the eclipse preferences. What about creating a "LinuxTools" root page for all of them ? Perhaps also move it into "C/C++" category ? What's your opinion on that ? Xavier _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
