So that synchronization sounds like a manual process, right? Say that two JVM's take part in a single trace-able event, like a JSP request on machine A to a SOAP server on machine B. This is a garden variety scenario for us. To include linux events, we'd than have four trace files:
JVM-A LINUX-A JVM-B LINUX-B So for sure, we'd want the manual synchronization process to handle more than just 2 files at one time. But manually collecting four trace files, and potentially more, will definitely discourage use of the tracing tool. We'll also need to keep the clocks of machine A & B in sync, right? Sooooo, it would be nice to have an interface layer that would allow: 1) First iteration, Java-CTF-trace-to-file-on-disk writer that requires manual synchronization merges, like (I think) you've detailed. 2) Subsequent Iteration: super-duper implementation that synchronized trace events on the fly from multiple trace sources, like CompuWare DynaTrace and CA Introscope. 3) Even Later implementation provides cluster-able event collection to deal with heavy load, like CompuWare DynaTrace and CA Introscope. So my suggestion is to spend some time to make the interface good, and the implementation pluggable. Thanks, --Erik -----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Montplaisir [mailto:alexmon...@voxpopuli.im] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 4:01 PM To: Ostermueller, Erik Cc: Linux Tools developer discussions Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] FW: Java code for CTF trace writing? Hi Erik, Typically, you would have one trace for your kernel events, and a separate one from the Java parser. In TMF, you can open multiple traces at the same time in what we call experiments. This allows you to see events coming from different traces in the same list. With regards to trace synchronization, an initial synchronization infrastructure was submitted at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://git.eclipse.org/r/%23/c/10869/&k=%2FbkpAUdJWZuiTILCq%2FFnQg%3D%3D%0A&r=k0mtagpeWG6phJwAIzKq%2B4lTFA1JCM2OiWhVYmwwWeM%3D%0A&m=7wZCs%2Fzc0UXoImIqO%2F7dsVBRRAbFPNp%2FkmKCA8GhyLc%3D%0A&s=1b3c6073cef1a6a95ea1118e922a1371ec16ae3026c1c4b571168eeb47b7d5c1 . If you have events in both your kernel and your Java trace that can be used to synchronize them together, it could be hooked into this infrastructure. We are hoping to merge it shortly after the Kepler release. Cheers, Alexandre On 13-05-06 10:37 AM, Ostermueller, Erik wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ostermueller, Erik [mailto:erik.ostermuel...@fisglobal.com] > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:34 AM > To: Aaron Spear; Matthew Khouzam > Cc: Philippe Proulx; Dominique Toupin; lttng-...@lists.lttng.org; > Linux Tools developer discussions > Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Java code for CTF trace writing? > > Hello all, > > I've got a question about the Java code that writes CTF traces. > Would this design provide a single trace with Java events and OS events in > the same trace? > Here is an example: > > Consider an all-Java program that sends an XML requests request over HTTP. > Would like the trace detail to show Java method activity as well as OS > activity that opens/closes the socket. > > This could be very helpful for unveiling the details of how Java code > consumes hardware resources. > > Thanks, > --Erik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Spear [mailto:asp...@vmware.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:51 PM > To: Matthew Khouzam > Cc: Philippe Proulx; Dominique Toupin; lttng-...@lists.lttng.org; > Linux Tools developer discussions > Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Java code for CTF trace writing? > >> When would you be available to work on this feature, I would love to >> sync up our efforts for this. > The way things look right now, I will have bandwidth for it in another month, > so middle to end of May. Perhaps sooner if all the stars align. > > Aaron _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
