No need to wait at all. Master is open for luna now and parent pom set to 3.0.
Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexandre Montplaisir" <alexmon...@voxpopuli.im> > To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurt...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Linux Tools developer discussions" <linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 7:43:22 PM > Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng and Luna > > Hi Alexander, > > I'd like to merge lttng-luna in as soon as possible. Should we wait for > something to be changed in master before we do so? > > As far as I can tell, we don't use anything that is Luna-specific (I > always use the 4.3 target definition to compile). > > > Thanks, > Alexandre > > > On 13-12-04 11:05 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Lttng devs, > > What is your plan to merge lttng-luna branch into master and killing > > lttng-luna branch? > > Do you use any luna specific APIs making it impossible to compile against > > Kepler platform? PTP changed the remote tools so we would need a bit more > > time before we can start compiling against Luna release train in master > > (unless someone jumps in to help). Let's get 3.0 discussion ongoing with > > this mail and add anything you were think of. > > > > Alexander Kurtakov > > Red Hat Eclipse team > > _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
