Hi Roland, I opened bug 520253 which hopefully is the cause behind your strange 'Outline' view.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=520253 The editor should hopefully work better for you with the 'Outline' view closed. You can use Ctrl+O as a fallback. Sorry for the inconvenience! Regards, Remy On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Remy Suen <remy.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Roland, thank you for taking the time to give things a whirl. > > I see there is a document synchronization problem from your 'Outline' view. > I have reproduced the bug and will open a bug against lsp4e later when I get > home. > > Regards, > Remy > > iPhoneから送信 > > 2017/07/27 5:56、Roland Grunberg <rgrun...@redhat.com> のメッセージ: > > On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 12:34 -0400, Roland Grunberg wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 18:57 +0300, akurtakov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Roland Grunberg <rgrun...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:12 +0300, akurtakov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Remy Suen <remy.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:31 PM, akurtakov <akurta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The last one would be the most time consuming as we will need all the CQs > > and etc. so we can distribute the language server with Linux Tools. > > > Is it a fair assumption that someone who installs the tools has Docker > > installed locally? If that is the case, perhaps the language server > > could be wrapped as a docker image and then the plug-in would just use > > `docker run` to launch and connect to it? Or is this idea a little too > > crazy? > > > And the image is distributed as part of Linux Tools? This looks a bit too > much to me. > > > Couldn't it all be generated ? I mean as long as Docker is on the > > system, we could : > > > Pull the 'node' image from the Dockerhub repository, build a new image > > from the Dockerfile that Remy specified earlier (we could certainly > > package the Dockerfile), run that new image (as a container) and then > > simply connect to it from the client side. > > > IMHO this makes the Dockerfile editor totally unreliable as any network > glitch and etc. will render it useless. > > > True, but the network would only be needed the first time (for pulling > > / building the necessary image). The argument could certainly be made > > that if a user just installed the tooling, they have a working internet > > connection for the time being. After that all subsequent uses would be > > relying on locally available resources so lack of connection wouldn't > > be an issue. > > > Cheers, > > > I've put together a basic proof of concept that's about 50 lines of > plugin.xml extensions and 20 lines of code : > > https://fedorapeople.org/~rgrunber/lsp-dockerfile.ogv > > I guess if we really want this, we should look into what needs to get > CQs opened (node, dockerfile-language-server-nodejs, etc.) and what can > be assumed to exist on the system. It still might be nice to also > support the case where the language server is provided through a > container. > > Cheers, > -- > Roland Grunberg > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev