Em 10-07-2010 09:33, Andy Walls escreveu: > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 03:51 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following >> patch were queued at the >> http://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-dvb.git tree: >> >> Subject: V4L/DVB: ivtv: use kthread_worker instead of workqueue >> Author: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon Jun 28 18:03:50 2010 -0300 >> >> Upcoming workqueue updates will no longer guarantee fixed workqueue to >> worker kthread association, so giving RT priority to the irq worker >> won't work. Use kthread_worker which guarantees specific kthread >> association instead. This also makes setting the priority cleaner. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> >> Reviewed-by: Andy Walls <[email protected]> >> Acked-by: Andy Walls <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]> > > Mauro, > > Please revert this or keep it from going upstream.
I already did it locally at commit 635c644cdd1557a69e99bda0dcadaf006b66d432. I just forgot to push it to the linuxtv repository ;) I just updated upstream with this patch and another set of commits I did here. > It relies on at least on other patch by Tejun. If this patch is > committed alone to the ivtv driver, it will break compilation of ivtv. > > I'm OK with Tejun getting this patch committed upstream together with > his complete workqueue patchset. Otherwise we''ll have some > coordination to go through when the workqueue patches go upstream. That > could be hard for everyone, since my response time lately has been > rather slow. Understood. Cheers, Mauro _______________________________________________ linuxtv-commits mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxtv-commits
