This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following patch 
were queued:

Subject: media: videobuf2: Remove duplicated index vs q->num_buffers check
Author:  Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaign...@collabora.com>
Date:    Thu Nov 9 17:29:18 2023 +0100

vb2_get_buffer() already checks if the requested index is valid.
Stop duplicating this kind of check everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaign...@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrze...@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-ci...@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org>

 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

---

diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c 
b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
index 37f814a89ace..6ba13a95323c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
+++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
@@ -817,10 +817,6 @@ int vb2_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device 
*mdev,
                return -EBUSY;
        }
 
-       if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
-               dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
-               return -EINVAL;
-       }
        vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
        if (!vb) {
                dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", b->index);
@@ -892,10 +888,6 @@ int vb2_expbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct 
v4l2_exportbuffer *eb)
 {
        struct vb2_buffer *vb;
 
-       if (eb->index >= q->num_buffers) {
-               dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
-               return -EINVAL;
-       }
        vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, eb->index);
        if (!vb) {
                dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", 
eb->index);

_______________________________________________
linuxtv-commits mailing list
linuxtv-commits@linuxtv.org
https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxtv-commits

Reply via email to