So what I meant by marked is like NSFW or something when posted. A chick flashing a camera on incredimazing or some random site, not so bad. A link to PB or jennajameson.com would violate almost any company's policies. Some don't monitor, some don't care, but other do monitor traffic and do care what you look at. For the most part some things aren't a big deal, a number of NSFW stuff would never bring up a comment, but as I said other things are almost blatent violations of company policies. It was really just a favor, if I know it might be questionable I can wait till later, but I was thinking that URL Chris posted regarding ITIL training was something other than what it was and maybe I would have a question or comment about the training and that link would have answered it.
Really no big deal, I was just asking, and now I am clarifying what I meant. On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Paul Saenz <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Chris Penn wrote: > > "Recently, you sent an email that said: In the future can links of > > that nature be marked. " > > > > I did? > > Oh...sorry Chris. Apparently, I'm not too sure I understood what was meant > by marking it. > Although now I see an arrow in my little mail icon, and I suppose that may > be what you are referring to. > > ------------------------------ > Store, manage and share up to 5GB with Windows Live SkyDrive. Start > uploading > now<http://skydrive.live.com/welcome.aspx?provision=1?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_skydrive_102008> > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > [email protected] > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > > -- Peter Manis (678) 269-7979
