I looked into Amazon S3. Based on my calculations Spideroak is only a bit cheaper. Essentially once you get into the terabyte range its several hundred dollars a month. At that point IMHO you are better off if you take what it will cost to use those services for a year and put it towards a some hardware of your own.
if you only need a few to 100 GB of space though its definitely a deal. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Chris Penn <[email protected]> wrote: > https://spideroak.com > > With all this talk about backups, I have a question. I am not one to > pay for backup service. I manage both on and off site backups for > work. I am curious what everybodys view on spideroak's services and > prices many be. Seems cheap to me. > > Chris... > > -- > "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to > be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." > -Roger Penrose > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > [email protected] > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >
