I have been keeping my dotfiles in Git for a while now. Very handy.
Since I access many systems it makes sense to keep them configured the
same. Not just at a package level but also the configuration level.
I've yet to do this at work but its on the to-do list. Then I just
have a git pull command in the login to keep my login the system
updated with my latest bash/vim or etc preferences. Putting /etc never
occurred to me though.

My new web site that i am working on uses git on the backend. Document
content and resources for documents, such as document-specific images
are read directly from a git repository. Publishing is as easy. Just
push to the repository. Whole other kind of CMS. hehe

-Chris



On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Brian Friday<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Still working with git here and came across a interesting link this
> weekend that I thought I would pass along:
>
> etckeeper:
> Reference URL: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/etckeeper/
>
> A collection of tools to let /etc be stored in a git, mercurial,
> darcs, or bzr repository. It hooks into apt (and other package
> managers including yum and pacman-g2) to automatically commit changes
> made to /etc during package upgrades. It tracks file metadata that
> revison control systems do not normally support, but that is important
> for /etc, such as the permissions of /etc/shadow. It's quite modular
> and configurable, while also being simple to use if you understand the
> basics of working with revision control.
>
> etckeeper is available in git at git://git.kitenet.net/etckeeper, or
> in gitweb. It's packaged in Debian; packages for other distributions
> are forthcoming.
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>

Reply via email to