Yeah 2nd what Pat said... why sell it if you wanna "save" it now... stupid.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Pat O'Brien <p...@petta-tech.com> wrote: > If they wanted to not lose control of it (have it discontinued, become > closed source, or otherwise) they probably shouldn't have sold it in the > first place, or at the very least structured the deal in such a way so that > something like this wouldn't be possible (although I don't know much about > the deal and whether or not this would be something that would have been > feasible to do, legally). > > /2 cents > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Ragi Y. Burhum <r...@burhum.com> wrote: > >> Monty's call for help: >> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html >> >> >> A different take - one I agree more with (with a few exceptions) >> http://bit.ly/3nrfH9 >> >> Honestly, I am biased since I am strong PostgreSQL proponent. >> >> What do you guys think? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > LinuxUsers@socallinux.org > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > >
_______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
