I use both Chrome and Firefox, each have their strong points. Chrome seems a bit faster and less cluttered, so I use it for my daily fun browsing. Then I use Firefox for my work and debugging. I'm used to tools like firebug and using foxyproxy to get through various network tunnels I have going. Each has their place, but Chrome is looking pretty good.
:wq! jason On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Chris Penn <cantorm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Chrome is interesting. Firefox does everything I need and more. A > second reason I have not switched to Chrome is because Firefox has a > better software license. Chrome uses the BSD license, blah. > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:17 AM, <char...@thewybles.com> wrote: >> Perhaps you could utilize privoxy and snort/clamav instead? >> >> Protect both email and web traffic >> >> >> ------Original Message------ >> From: David Kaiser >> Sender: linuxusers-boun...@socallinux.org >> To: SoCal LUG Users List >> ReplyTo: SoCal LUG Users List >> Subject: [LinuxUsers] Finally got around to trying Google Chrome for Linux >> Sent: Jan 28, 2010 10:46 PM >> >> I know everyone has gotten Chrome for Linux installed for a few weeks >> now, but I'm just getting around to trying it out. >> >> One interesting thing I noted... On the download page ( >> http://www.google.com/chrome/index.html ) they provide pre-built >> binaries for Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora/openSUSE... but no commercial RedHat, >> SuSE builds. I found that very interesting, because the distributions >> they provide a download for are typically going to be the ones that >> someone will quickly package it up for anyway - versus the commercial >> distributions would take their sweet time to eventually put Chrome in a >> future release. Of course, it is also just plain cool that Google is >> choosing the non-commercial distributions. The source is available for >> anyone to build - technically they don't even need to release binaries, >> but they're making it easier for the most popular distros I guess. >> >> Anyway, it is a very fast browser... but I think there is one thing >> missing... the NoScript extension, or an equivalent. I try to block >> most javascript unless I white-list a particular site. >> >> Has anyone found a good "noscript-like" extension for Chrome browser on >> Linux? >> >> Thanks, >> DK >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> >> >> >> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> > > > > -- > "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to > be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." > -Roger Penrose > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > LinuxUsers@socallinux.org > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > _______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
