On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Jeff Lasman <jpli...@nobaloney.net> wrote:

[snip]

> Some universities waste many hundreds of /24s, I don't know of any who have
> Class-C allocations (for the record for those who don't know, there is a
> fundamental difference between a /24 and a true Class-C allocation,

Sokolov has a /24 allocated in the 208.221.139.0 addressing space,
which would be considered an original class C assignment, given the
first 3 bits. The only difference is that a class C network would be 192
to 223 but a classless /24 could be anywhere in the IPv4 space.

Nitpicking at its best.

> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network
>
> Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing
>
> but note that the Class Column is misleading.  It indicates not that (for
> example), a /24 is equivalent to a Class-C allocation, but rather that the
> number of addresses in a /24 is equivalent to the number of addresses in a
> Class-C allocation.

A /24 network has the same number of usable addresses as a class C
allocation, which is 254. I fail to notice how the class column (at the CIDR
article) is misleading.

--
Dante
_______________________________________________
LinuxUsers mailing list
LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers

Reply via email to