On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Daniel Eggleston <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll second those suggestions, and add mercurial to the mix. The > distributed ones are much better to work with, IMHO. > > There are probably a hundred common ways to serve subversion over a network > (you can use http(s), svn protocol, ssh, a directory mounted over nfs, and > on and on. > > Without any details, it would be tough to give a recommendation.
While I agree that many of the DVCS solutions are technologically superior, often times it's best to go with Subversion for simplicity, how ubiquitous it is, and because it integrates with many tools. The simplest way to deploy Subversion is through Apache using an LDAP or mod_dbd authenticator, with the hard-core serving through mod_dav and mod_dav_svn. If you Google you'll find enough how-to's to fill many hard disks with. Have fun (HINT: use LDAP. Fedora has a good LDAP wizard IIRC). -- Registered Linux Addict #431495 http://profile.xfire.com/mrstalinman | John 3:16! http://www.fsdev.net/ | http://lordsauron.wordpress.com/ Parents, Take Responsibility For Your Kids! http://www.whattheyplay.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
