Hi Arvid.
I'm definately not an ACL expert, but this is my thoughts on it: Files create in Linux does not get the execute bit set per default, no matter which umask you choose to use. It is very likely that this also applies to ACL-based control mechanisms. What does "ls -l fil10" say? And does directories created under /test get "rwx" permissions? Regards, Kenneth On 4/27/09, netman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have this ACL setting on a folder /test > [r...@venus /]# getfacl t > # file: test > # owner: root > # group: root > user::rwx > user:solan:rwx > group::rwx > mask::rwx > other::r-x > default:user::rwx > default:user:solan:rwx > default:group::rwx > default:mask::rwx > default:other::r-x > > When i enter /test as user Solan and create an file fil10 i got this > ACL setting: > [so...@venus test]$ getfacl fil10 > # file: fil10 > # owner: solan > # group: solan > user::rw- > user:solan:rwx #effective:rw- > group::rwx #effective:rw-#effective:rw- > mask::rw- > other::r-- > > Why do i get #effective:rw- rights as long i have mask (ACL) and > default mask (ACL) in /test ? > > I want default mask to be rwx for files created in /test then i don't > get "#effective:rw-" > > Is there someone ACL experts out there that can help me ? > > Regards Arvid > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
