--- In [email protected], "Nadeem M. Khan"
<nadeem.m.k...@...> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:48 AM, senty_dil <arpittol...@...> wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "Nadeem M. Khan"
> Hi Arpit,
>
> > even my messages are taking longer than usual to post...
>
> Are you top posting? Please check your sent items to be sure.
>
> >
> > i submitted a iptables problem around 4 days back but it is not yet
> > published..
>
> The last message from you (senty_dil) was on Dec 31 with the subject
> "Cache peer between squid and ISA 2006 Enterprises". I do not see any
> pending messages from you.
>
> >
> > please look for the issue and tell me if i did something wrong so my
> > messages wernt posted...
>
> We do not block any messages unless they blatantly break the
> guidelines. If a member does not adhere to the guidelines, at most, he
> would not be removed from moderation and his messages would take time
> to appear.
>
> Regards,
> NMK.
>
Hello Nadeem Sir..
i posted again.. but didnt published..
is there problem is fresh posting... i am posting here
We have a website and we redirect out data by real ip on port 85 from
a local IIS server...
by this we are redirecting our request
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 85 -j DNAT
--to-destination 192.168.11.5
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 85 -j DNAT
--to-destination 192.168.11.5
then i thought to block all the request except one
so this is the rule
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 85 -s 208.43.17.250 -j ACCEPT
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 85 -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j DROP
then i read that there should be FORWARD rule, so i tried
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m tcp --dport 85 -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j DROP
but it didnt worked out.. please check and tell where was i wrong...
it is urgent...
