On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:57 PM, DoOrsOfpErcEpTioN <[email protected]> wrote:
> It makes sense to read question and then answer. how else any1 would do > otherwise? > The above is quite a subjective issue. Some ppl like me can use snip-in > format of reply. This reply to u is a snip without the use of '<snip>' > since we have '>' to indicate former response. > Some just dont delete former response(s) may be bcos: (a) it is either > included by default and/or (b) modifying original reponse is an > unethical practice. > I think classical semantics (that u r highlighting) do not approve of > modifying original either! We are not in a teen chat room. I am not comfortable reading your chat-style lingo. Is it too much of an effort for you too use proper, professional English instead of words like any1, ppl, u, bcos, r ? Regards, NMK.
