On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:42:30PM -0600, Erich Hoover wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Chris Bagwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ... > > Yeah, it if the button/key is meant to launch an app (even a GUI > > config app) then KEY_'s are usually better choice because only those > > can bind in easily to your desktop environment's keyboard shortcut > > log. > > > > Sorry I haven't replied in a while, I've been a bit busy. I don't suppose > you know how to get key codes greater than 255 (KEY_KEYBOARD) to work? > xf86PostKeyboardEvent seems to ignore all codes greater than 255.
That is correct, but unfortunately there's not much we can do about it at the moment. It's a long-standing X server bug that is very invasive to fix. http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11227 Cheers, Peter > For my tablet netbook, I'm starting to look into the rotate issue > > since it has a rotate button. I've gotten as far as seeing the > > gnome-settings-daemon detects XF86RotateWindows to rotate the screen > > (if I'm reading it right) and X has at least this for that value: > > > > symbols/inet: key <I162> { [ XF86RotateWindows ] }; > > > > I explored that a while ago, the corresponding code is KEY_CYCLEWINDOWS (< > 255, works grrreat!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/ _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
