On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 06:31:07PM -0500, Favux ... wrote: > Hi, > > Nick feels that there is no need currently to have several Waltop > tablet Classes using either the Wacom or new Waltop Classes. He > thinks the differences between models aren't significant enough to > justify it. In fact he would prefer a broader Class than Waltop in > case the decision is to transfer the KYE tablet's stylus to > xf86-input-wacom also. And maybe eventually the UC-Logic tablets. > > Right now I'm leaning toward the Class 'NonWacom' over 'Generic' or > 'Other'. But I'm open to suggestions. :)
I think there is a bit of confusion as to _what_ the libwacom class actually means: it provides a rough categorization of the tablet the user has. Tablets inside a class have similar features, and possible examples for future usage could include things like displaying a Intuos3-specific icon vs an Intuos4-specific icon. Right now, GNOME differs between built-in, Cintiq and other (which looks like an I3) for icon display. So I think for non-wacom tablets there is room for a class per model-line to allow for similar features. I don't really want a built-in Waltop mashed into a generic class with a standalone USB Waltop model. Cheer, Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
