A new topic, 'Problems with a migration using Liquibase', has been made on a
board you are watching.
You can see it at
http://liquibase.org/forum/index.php?topic=839.new#new
The text of the topic is shown below:
Our team has the following problem. We would like to start using Liquibase and
start developing with local databases. Our existing application uses a oracle
database and the local databases will be postgresql.
We have the following plan:
1) use Liquibase to generate an initial changelog from the oracle database
2) use the initial changelog to populate the postgresql databases.
Question 1: Is this a sound plan, or are we missing something?
The changelog generated at step 1 contains type information that are not
compatible for step 2. For example there is a column tag with
type="VARCHAR2(255 BYTE)". The SQL then contains this literal type information.
Question 2: Why are these non-generic types generated?
Question 2a: Could this be a jdbc driver problem?
Any help would be appreciated.
Unsubscribe to new topics from this board by clicking here:
http://liquibase.org/forum/index.php?action=notifyboard;board=1.0
Regards,
The Liquibase Community Forum Team.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Liquibase-user mailing list
Liquibase-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liquibase-user
