On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Vince Fuller <[email protected]> wrote: > I realized after I sent my last note that I forgot one of the points: > >> f) Further, the appropriate behavior of a Map-Resolver when proxying >> is requested is NOT specified anywhere. > > A Map Resolver doesn't act as a proxy; a Map Server may. If a Map Server > is acting as a proxy, then it returns a Map-Reply on behalf of a registered > ETR that has requested proxy service.
True - but the logic is specified for a Map Resolver to consult its local database... I've sent you copious text that I think describes the proxying behavior Alia > > --Vince > (for the other co-authors) > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
