Hello, On 15 Aug 2011, at 23:34, liuyan.adams wrote:
> To who it may concern > > I am a junior student from a univeristy of China and I read LISP > draft about internetworking ,LISP ALT , mobile node recently. > Firstly, I personally feel that EID-to-RLOC mapping through LISP ALT > is not efficient because ALT router routes EID . > So I have questions as follows > Will that create a large route table considering a large variety of > EID? Even though EID is assigned by internet registry, in some region where a > large population will migrate to another, the original hierarchical structure > will then be destoyed. > Will that make the time cost on mapping request longer? Because i > think the time spend on lookup the routes will increase. You can have a look at "LISP-TREE: A DNS Hierarchy to Support the LISP Mapping System" http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=5586446 for this. > Will the mobile node fail to keep connection with others because of > the mapping efficiency? > I find no answer to the above questions but I feel that the > efficiency of the EID-to-RLOC mapping determine the future's development > of LISP. So I wonder do you have any solutions to solve this problem? It is definitely an important question and solutions are on-going. Damien Saucez > > I am really looking forward to your reply. > > Sincerely. > > YAN LIU > > 2011-08-16 > liuyan.adams > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
