> And also in Sections 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.6. That is > quite a bit of deliberation about MTU, and I think > goes to show the degree of uncertainty in the main > document's approach even before an experiment is > conducted. > > So what makes more sense? To go forward with a > "slacker's" approach that is riddled with doubts > which might not even be satisfied through extensive > experimentation, or to adopt a lightweight mechanism > from IRON/SEAL that stands a good chance of erasing > all doubts?
There are no doubts or uncertainty. The text is written to satisfy all commenters, that is a compromise. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
