Hi Albert,
On 29/10/11 3:04 AM, "Albert Cabellos" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Should LISP mobility be specifically included in the work plan? >> > > I would like to point out that we have a small but growing community of > people interested into LISPmob, we open-sourced the code 1.5 months ago. > To be clear (as in crystal) does this mean you think that mobility should be included? or are you simply making the observation that there is a community of people 'out there' who are yet to be vocal on this ML. Cheers Terry _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
