> I have some news for you. The LISP base specification has just been approved > yesterday, joining the three other documents from this working group that had > already been approved earlier. We'll be working with the remaining two in the > coming weeks.
I thought we have 3 more remaining. That is interworking, ms, and map-versioning. Off by one error? What is waiting RFC editor queue is main, multicast, lig, alt. So we are only 4 out of 7 complete. Please confirm Jari. Dino > The other piece of news is that the IESG has reviewed and discussed your > proposed charter, and had a number of suggested changes. The main thrust of > the changes is as follows: > > 1) Cut down the number of items to stay focused; the IESG felt that there was > too much material in the proposed charter. > > 2) Make some items priority 1 deliverables and add some items that are > important. The IESG felt that as it had reviewed the base specifications, it > now had a good view of what documentation there is on LISP and is still > missing. In particular, it was felt that an architecture specification that > paints some of the bigger picture would be valuable. > > Please find attached the proposed charter revision from the IESG along with a > diff file to the one that was circulated in the WG list some time ago. > > We plan to approve this charter in the near future, if you have any > objections please bring them up as soon as possible either on the WG mailing > list or to [email protected] > > Jari > > > <charter-new-proposal-from-the-iesg-ver2-from-original-proposal.diff.html><charter-new-proposal-from-the-iesg-ver2.txt>_______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
